+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Kimi-k1.5
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi-k1.5 leads with 8.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Kimi-k1.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi-k1.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 81.7% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (96.2%), CLUEWSC (91.4%), C-Eval (88.3%). As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Kimi-k1.5
Moonshot AI
2025-01-20
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:32.3%
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Average Score:40.9%(+8.5%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:32.3%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Kimi-k1.5
Avg Score:40.9%(+8.5%)
Providers:0