Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 5.5% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 0905 offers 196.3K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4. Kimi K2 0905 is $86.90 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. This model demonstrates exceptional performance with an average score of 84.0% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HumanEval (94.5%), MMLU (90.2%), MATH (89.1%). It supports a 524K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Kimi K2 0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Opus 4
Kimi K2 0905
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
Kimi K2 0905
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
Kimi K2 0905
Claude Opus 4
Kimi K2 0905
Kimi K2 0905
Novita
ZeroEval