+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 leads with 37.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905 is a language model developed by Moonshot AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.1% across 29 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MATH-500 (97.4%), MMLU-Redux (92.7%), IFEval (89.8%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Moonshot AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Moonshot AI
2025-09-05
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 33 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:17.6%
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Average Score:54.9%(+37.3%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:17.6%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Kimi K2-Instruct-0905
Avg Score:54.9%(+37.3%)
Providers:0