+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct leads with 38.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Microsoft
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 65.6% across 31 benchmarks. It excels particularly in ARC-C (91.0%), OpenBookQA (89.6%), GSM8k (88.7%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2024, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Microsoft
2024-08-23
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 38 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:15.3%
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Average Score:53.5%(+38.2%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:15.3%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Phi-3.5-MoE-instruct
Avg Score:53.5%(+38.2%)
Providers:0