Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 15.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 64.6% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (88.8%), TAU-bench Retail (81.4%), GPQA (79.6%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 78.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.9%), HumanEval+ (92.3%), IFEval (84.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
22 days newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
Claude Opus 4
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Opus 4
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Claude Opus 4
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus