Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 55.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 311.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $89.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V2.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V2.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V2.5
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V2.5

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V2.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic