Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 11.2% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 320 more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $88.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
4 months newer

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V3.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V3.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Opus 4

DeepSeek-V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita