Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 32.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is $89.25 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
Meta
Llama 3.2 90B was developed as a flagship-tier open-source model, designed to provide advanced capabilities with 90 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring high-quality reasoning and generation, it represents a powerful option within the Llama 3.2 series for demanding tasks.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Claude Opus 4

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct

Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Bedrock
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Hyperbolic
Together