+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 30.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 32B was created as a larger variant in the Qwen 2.5 family, designed to deliver enhanced capabilities with 32 billion parameters. Built to serve applications requiring stronger reasoning and generation quality, it represents a powerful option for demanding language understanding tasks.
8 months newer
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:79.6%(+30.1%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Average Score:49.5%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:79.6%(+30.1%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 32B Instruct
Avg Score:49.5%
Providers:0