+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct. Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct is $89.82 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 Coder 32B was developed as a specialized coding model, designed to excel at programming tasks with 32 billion parameters specifically optimized for code. Built to understand and generate code across multiple programming languages, it serves developers requiring advanced code completion, debugging, and explanation capabilities.
8 months newer
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Input:$0.09
Output:$0.09($89.82 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5-Coder 32B Instruct
Avg Score:0.0%
Providers:4