+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 9.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 235B A22B. Qwen3 235B A22B is $89.80 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
23 days newer
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10($89.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:81.3%(+9.4%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:71.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:81.3%(+9.4%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:71.9%
Providers:4