+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 2.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $89.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
23 days newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($89.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:75.5%(+2.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:72.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:75.5%(+2.6%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:72.9%
Providers:3