+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4 vs QwQ-32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4 leads with 14.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4 was developed as the flagship model in the Claude 4 generation, designed to push the boundaries of AI capability in complex reasoning, analysis, and multi-step problem-solving. Built to handle the most demanding enterprise tasks, it represents Anthropic's highest tier of intelligence and capability.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
QwQ 32B was developed as a reasoning-focused model, designed to emphasize analytical thinking and problem-solving capabilities. Built with 32 billion parameters optimized for step-by-step reasoning, it demonstrates Qwen's exploration into models that prioritize deliberate analytical processing.
2 months newer
QwQ-32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-03-05
Claude Opus 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Average Score:79.6%(+14.4%)
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Average Score:65.2%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
QwQ-32B
2024-11-28
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4
Avg Score:79.6%(+14.4%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
QwQ-32B
Avg Score:65.2%
Providers:0