Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 14.5% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-R1-0528 offers 30.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $87.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
2 months newer

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-R1-0528

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita