Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 57.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 offers 215.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $89.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-V2.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-V2.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-V2.5
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-V2.5

Claude Opus 4.1

DeepSeek-V2.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic