+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Gemma 3 12B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 40.0% higher average benchmark score. Gemma 3 12B offers 30.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Gemma 3 12B is $89.85 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B was developed as part of the third generation of Google's open-source model family, designed to provide enhanced capabilities in a mid-sized format. Built with improved architecture and training techniques, it balances performance with practical deployment considerations for diverse use cases.
4 months newer
Gemma 3 12B
2025-03-12
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Input:$0.05
Output:$0.10($89.85 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:80.9%(+40.0%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Average Score:40.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:80.9%(+40.0%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 12B
Avg Score:40.9%
Providers:1