Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 12.6% higher average benchmark score. Kimi K2 Instruct offers 30.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Kimi K2 Instruct is $87.13 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
Moonshot AI
Kimi K2 Instruct was developed as the instruction-tuned version of Kimi K2, designed to follow user instructions reliably across diverse tasks. Built to serve general-purpose conversational and task-completion applications, it provides Moonshot's accessible interface for language AI.
25 days newer

Kimi K2 Instruct
Moonshot AI
2025-07-11

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4.1

Kimi K2 Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1

Kimi K2 Instruct
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Opus 4.1

Kimi K2 Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4.1

Kimi K2 Instruct

Claude Opus 4.1

Kimi K2 Instruct

Kimi K2 Instruct
Novita