Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 39.2% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct offers 24.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is $89.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Llama 3.1 70B Instruct is available on 9 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
Meta
Llama 3.1 70B was created as a balanced open-source model, designed to provide strong performance with 70 billion parameters while remaining practical for many deployment scenarios. Built to serve as a versatile foundation for fine-tuning and application development, it combines capability with accessibility in the open-source ecosystem.
1 year newer

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Meta
2024-07-23

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
Bedrock
Cerebras
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Hyperbolic
Lambda
Sambanova
Together