Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 48.1% higher average benchmark score. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct offers 24.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $89.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
10 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude Opus 4.1

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra