+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Nova Pro
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 34.0% higher average benchmark score. Nova Pro offers 368.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Opus 4.1. Nova Pro is $86.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
+
+
+
+
Amazon
Amazon Nova Pro was developed as the flagship model in the Nova family, designed to provide advanced multimodal understanding across text, images, and other modalities. Built to handle complex tasks requiring sophisticated reasoning, it represents Amazon's most capable offering for enterprise applications.
8 months newer
Nova Pro
Amazon
2024-11-20
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Input:$0.80
Output:$3.20($86.00 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:80.9%(+34.0%)
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Average Score:46.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:80.9%(+34.0%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Nova Pro
Avg Score:46.9%
Providers:1