+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Opus 4.1 vs Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Opus 4.1 leads with 31.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Opus 4.1 offers 92.7K more tokens in context window than Qwen2.5 72B Instruct. Qwen2.5 72B Instruct is $89.25 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Opus 4.1 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Opus 4.1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Opus 4.1 represents an iteration within the Claude 4 Opus line, built to deliver refined performance in complex reasoning and analysis tasks. Developed as part of Anthropic's flagship tier, it incorporates improvements to the foundational capabilities that define the Opus family of models.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen 2.5 72B was developed as the flagship text model in the Qwen 2.5 series, designed to provide advanced language capabilities with 72 billion parameters. Built to compete with frontier models in reasoning, coding, and general language tasks, it represents Qwen's most capable instruction-following model in this generation.
10 months newer
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2024-09-19
Claude Opus 4.1
Anthropic
2025-08-05
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Input:$15.00
Output:$75.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Input:$0.35
Output:$0.40($89.25 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Average Score:80.9%(+31.9%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Average Score:49.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 100 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 120 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Opus 4.1
Avg Score:80.9%(+31.9%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen2.5 72B Instruct
Avg Score:49.0%
Providers:4