Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
DeepSeek VL2 leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 69.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude Sonnet 4 is $4791.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, DeepSeek VL2 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek VL2 is a multimodal language model developed by DeepSeek. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.9% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in DocVQA (93.3%), ChartQA (86.0%), TextVQA (84.2%). It supports a 259K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2024, it represents DeepSeek's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4
DeepSeek VL2
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 21 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4
DeepSeek VL2
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4
DeepSeek VL2
Claude Sonnet 4
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek VL2
Replicate