Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 287.0K more tokens in context window than Gemini 1.0 Pro. Gemini 1.0 Pro is $16.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 1.0 Pro is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 9 benchmarks. Notable strengths include BIG-Bench (75.0%), MMLU (71.8%), WMT23 (71.7%). The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-15
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro
2024-02-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemini 1.0 Pro