+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.5 Flash
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash leads with 17.7% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Flash offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4. Gemini 2.5 Flash is $15.20 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Flash is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 62.5% across 14 benchmarks. It excels particularly in Global-MMLU-Lite (88.4%), AIME 2024 (88.0%), FACTS Grounding (85.3%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-05-20
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Input:$0.30
Output:$2.50($15.20 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:30.9%
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Average Score:48.6%(+17.7%)
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.5 Flash
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:30.9%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Avg Score:48.6%(+17.7%)
Providers:2