Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 27.9% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 786.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
2 days newer
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 20 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval