Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 60.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 62.0K more tokens in context window than Grok Code Fast 1. Grok Code Fast 1 is $16.30 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
xAI
Grok Code Fast 1 is a language model developed by xAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 70.8% across 1 benchmarks. Notable strengths include SWE-Bench Verified (70.8%). It supports a 266K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2025, it represents xAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
3 months newer
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI
2025-08-28
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4
Grok Code Fast 1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 8 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4
Grok Code Fast 1
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4
Grok Code Fast 1
Claude Sonnet 4
Grok Code Fast 1
Grok Code Fast 1
xAI