Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 18.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.4% across 8 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (86.5%), TAU-bench Retail (80.5%), GPQA (75.4%). It supports a 328K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 4 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 78.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.9%), HumanEval+ (92.3%), IFEval (84.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
22 days newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 17 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Claude Sonnet 4
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus