+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Command R+
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 15.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Command R+. Command R+ is $16.75 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Cohere
Command R+ is a language model developed by Cohere. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 74.6% across 6 benchmarks. It excels particularly in HellaSwag (88.6%), Winogrande (85.4%), MMLU (75.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents Cohere's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Command R+
Cohere
2024-08-30
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Input:$0.25
Output:$1.00($16.75 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 15 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average Score:45.5%(+15.6%)
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Average Score:29.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Avg Score:45.5%(+15.6%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Command R+
Avg Score:29.8%
Providers:2