Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Gemini 2.5 Pro leads with 19.6% higher average benchmark score. Gemini 2.5 Pro offers 850.1K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Gemini 2.5 Pro is $6.75 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Gemini 2.5 Pro is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Gemini 2.5 Pro is a multimodal language model developed by Google. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 69.6% across 16 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MRCR (93.0%), AIME 2024 (92.0%), Global-MMLU-Lite (88.6%). With a 1.1M token context window, it can handle extensive documents and complex multi-turn conversations. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
4 months newer
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-05-20
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 22 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Gemini 2.5 Pro
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ZeroEval