+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4.5 vs Gemma 3 1B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 5.5% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B is a language model developed by Google. The model shows competitive results across 18 benchmarks. It excels particularly in IFEval (80.2%), GSM8k (62.8%), Natural2Code (56.0%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Google's latest advancement in AI technology.
6 months newer
Gemma 3 1B
2025-03-12
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 26 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Average Score:26.2%(+5.5%)
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Average Score:20.7%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Avg Score:26.2%(+5.5%)
Providers:2
+
+
+
+
Gemma 3 1B
Avg Score:20.7%
Providers:0