Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 21.1% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 67.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $15.40 cheaper per million tokens. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 is a multimodal language model developed by Zhipu AI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.2% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in AIME 2025 (93.9%), LiveCodeBench v6 (82.8%), GPQA (81.0%). It supports a 197K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Zhipu AI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 days newer
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 12 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
GLM-4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GLM-4.6
DeepInfra
ZeroEval