Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 17.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 1.9K more tokens in context window than GPT OSS 120B. GPT OSS 120B is $17.46 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. GPT OSS 120B is available on 5 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
GPT OSS 120B is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 61.7% across 7 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMLU (90.0%), CodeForces (87.4%), GPQA (80.1%). It supports a 262K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 5 API providers. It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 month newer
GPT OSS 120B
OpenAI
2025-08-05
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT OSS 120B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 14 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT OSS 120B
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT OSS 120B
Claude Sonnet 4.5
GPT OSS 120B
GPT OSS 120B
DeepInfra
Groq
Novita
OpenAI
ZeroEval