Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct leads with 6.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $17.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is a language model developed by Meta. The model shows competitive results across 15 benchmarks. It excels particularly in NIH/Multi-needle (84.7%), ARC-C (78.6%), GSM8k (77.7%). It supports a 256K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 1 API provider. Released in 2024, it represents Meta's latest advancement in AI technology.
1 year newer
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra