Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
o1 leads with 29.5% higher average benchmark score. o1 offers 36.0K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is $57.00 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, o1 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
OpenAI
o1 is a language model developed by OpenAI. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 71.6% across 19 benchmarks. It excels particularly in GSM8k (97.1%), MATH (96.4%), GPQA Physics (92.8%). It supports a 300K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. Released in 2024, it represents OpenAI's latest advancement in AI technology.
9 months newer
o1
OpenAI
2024-12-17
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)
Claude Sonnet 4.5
o1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 23 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
o1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4.5
o1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
o1
o1
Azure
OpenAI