Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus leads with 10.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4.5 is available on 2 providers. Overall, Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 is a multimodal language model developed by Anthropic. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 75.8% across 9 benchmarks. It excels particularly in MMMLU (89.1%), AIME 2025 (87.0%), TAU-bench Retail (86.2%). It supports a 264K token context window for handling large documents. The model is available through 2 API providers. As a multimodal model, it can process and understand text, images, and other input formats seamlessly. Released in 2025, it represents Anthropic's latest advancement in AI technology.
Microsoft
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus is a language model developed by Microsoft. It achieves strong performance with an average score of 78.9% across 11 benchmarks. It excels particularly in FlenQA (97.9%), HumanEval+ (92.3%), IFEval (84.9%). It's licensed for commercial use, making it suitable for enterprise applications. Released in 2025, it represents Microsoft's latest advancement in AI technology.
5 months newer
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Microsoft
2025-04-30
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 18 common benchmarks
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
2025-03-01
Available providers and their performance metrics
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Claude Sonnet 4.5
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus
Phi 4 Reasoning Plus