Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 55.9% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 311.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $17.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V2.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V2.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V2.5
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V2.5

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V2.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic