Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 8.0% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 320 more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3.1. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $16.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
4 months newer

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V3.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V3.1
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Sonnet 4

DeepSeek-V3.1

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita