+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs DeepSeek VL2
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 23.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 69.4K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek VL2. Claude Sonnet 4 is $4791.50 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-VL2 was developed as a vision-language model, designed to handle both visual and textual inputs for multimodal understanding tasks. Built to extend DeepSeek's capabilities beyond text-only processing, it enables applications requiring integrated analysis of images and language.
5 months newer
DeepSeek VL2
DeepSeek
2024-12-13
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00($4791.50 cheaper)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Input:$9.50
Output:$4800.00
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:74.4%(+23.3%)
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Average Score:51.1%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:74.4%(+23.3%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
DeepSeek VL2
Avg Score:51.1%
Providers:1