+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Both models show comparable benchmark performance. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking was developed to incorporate extended reasoning capabilities into the Flash family, designed to combine quick response times with deeper analytical processing. Built to handle tasks requiring both speed and thoughtful problem-solving, it bridges the gap between fast inference and reasoning-enhanced models.
4 months newer
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2025-01-21
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:74.9%(+0.1%)
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Average Score:74.8%
+
+
+
+
Knowledge Cutoff
Training data recency comparison
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
2024-08-01
More recent knowledge cutoff means awareness of newer technologies and frameworks
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:74.9%(+0.1%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
Avg Score:74.8%
Providers:0