+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs GLM-4.6
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
GLM-4.6 leads with 7.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 131.4K more tokens in context window than GLM-4.6. GLM-4.6 is $15.40 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, GLM-4.6 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
Zhipu AI
GLM-4.6 was introduced as an enhanced iteration of the GLM-4 series, designed to provide improved capabilities in bilingual language understanding and generation. Built to incorporate refinements to the GLM architecture, it represents continued advancement in Zhipu AI's model development.
4 months newer
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
GLM-4.6
Zhipu AI
2025-09-30
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Input:$0.60
Output:$2.00($15.40 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:63.5%
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Average Score:70.9%(+7.3%)
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Coding72.7%(+4.7%)
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Coding68.0%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:63.5%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
GLM-4.6
Avg Score:70.9%(+7.3%)
Providers:2