+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Grok-1.5V
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 20.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
xAI
Grok 1.5V was introduced as a vision-enabled variant of Grok 1.5, designed to understand and reason about both images and text. Built to extend Grok's capabilities into multimodal applications, it enables visual question answering and image analysis alongside textual understanding.
1 year newer
Grok-1.5V
xAI
2024-04-12
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:74.4%(+20.8%)
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Average Score:53.6%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:74.4%(+20.8%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Grok-1.5V
Avg Score:53.6%
Providers:0