Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 42.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Llama 3.2 3B Instruct. Llama 3.2 3B Instruct is $17.97 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Claude Sonnet 4 is available on 4 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
Meta
Llama 3.2 3B was created as an ultra-compact open-source model, designed to enable on-device and edge deployment scenarios. Built with just 3 billion parameters while retaining instruction-following abilities, it brings Meta's language technology to mobile devices, IoT applications, and resource-constrained environments.
7 months newer

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Meta
2024-09-25

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
DeepInfra