Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 11.6% higher average benchmark score. Llama 4 Scout offers 19.7M more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4. Llama 4 Scout is $17.62 cheaper per million tokens. Llama 4 Scout is available on 6 providers. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
Meta
Llama 4 Scout was created as an exploratory variant in the Llama 4 family, designed to investigate new architectures and optimization strategies. Built as part of Meta's commitment to advancing open-source AI, it serves as a testbed for innovations that may inform future model releases.
1 month newer

Llama 4 Scout
Meta
2025-04-05

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 4 Scout
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 4 Scout
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
Bedrock
ZeroEval

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 4 Scout

Claude Sonnet 4

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Scout
DeepInfra
Fireworks
Groq
Lambda
Novita
Together