+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 235B A22B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4 leads with 5.6% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 235B A22B. Qwen3 235B A22B is $17.80 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 235B was developed as a large-scale model with 235 billion total parameters using a mixture-of-experts architecture activating 22 billion parameters. Built to provide frontier capabilities with computational efficiency through sparse activation, it represents Qwen's advancement into very large-scale model development.
23 days newer
Qwen3 235B A22B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.10($17.80 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 3 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:77.5%(+5.6%)
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Average Score:71.9%
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:77.5%(+5.6%)
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 235B A22B
Avg Score:71.9%
Providers:4