+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
VS
Claude Sonnet 4 vs Qwen3 32B
Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Qwen3 32B leads with 2.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4 offers 72.0K more tokens in context window than Qwen3 32B. Qwen3 32B is $17.60 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4 supports multimodal inputs. Both models have their strengths depending on your specific coding needs.
+
+
+
+
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4 was created as the balanced offering in the Claude 4 family, designed to provide strong intelligence with practical speed and cost efficiency. Built to serve as a versatile workhorse for diverse applications, it balances advanced capabilities with operational considerations for everyday enterprise and consumer use.
+
+
+
+
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3 32B was developed as a dense 32-billion-parameter model in the Qwen3 family, designed to provide strong language understanding without mixture-of-experts complexity. Built for applications requiring straightforward deployment and reliable performance, it serves as a capable mid-to-large-scale foundation model.
23 days newer
Qwen3 32B
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
2025-04-29
Claude Sonnet 4
Anthropic
2025-05-22
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
Pricing Comparison
Cost per million tokens (USD)
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Input:$3.00
Output:$15.00
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Input:$0.10
Output:$0.30($17.60 cheaper)
Performance Metrics
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Average Score:70.5%
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Average Score:72.9%(+2.4%)
Provider Availability & Performance
Available providers and their performance metrics
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
4 providers
Anthropic
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
Bedrock
Throughput: 101 tok/s
Latency: 0.5ms
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
ZeroEval
Throughput: 42 tok/s
Latency: 0.4ms
+
+
+
+
Claude Sonnet 4
Avg Score:70.5%
Providers:4
+
+
+
+
Qwen3 32B
Avg Score:72.9%(+2.4%)
Providers:3