Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 19.7% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 1.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-R1-0528. DeepSeek-R1-0528 is $15.35 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-0528 represents a specific release iteration of the DeepSeek-R1 model, developed to incorporate refinements and improvements from ongoing training. Built to provide enhanced reasoning capabilities based on accumulated insights, it continues the evolution of DeepSeek's reasoning-focused architecture.
4 months newer

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek
2025-05-28

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepSeek-R1-0528
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Novita