Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 21.3% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 8.0K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B. DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B is $17.70 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-32B was created as a larger distilled variant, designed to transfer more of DeepSeek-R1's reasoning capabilities into a Qwen-based foundation. Built to serve applications requiring enhanced analytical depth, it represents a powerful option in the distilled reasoning model family.
8 months newer

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek
2025-01-20

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 32B
DeepInfra