Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 60.4% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 247.6K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V2.5. DeepSeek-V2.5 is $17.58 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V2.5 was developed as an enhanced iteration of the DeepSeek-V2 architecture, designed to incorporate improvements in model quality and efficiency. Built to advance the DeepSeek foundation model series, it provides refined capabilities for general-purpose language understanding and generation tasks.
1 year newer

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek
2024-05-08

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 1 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V2.5

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepSeek-V2.5
DeepInfra
DeepSeek
Hyperbolic