Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 29.8% higher average benchmark score. Claude Sonnet 4.5 offers 1.9K more tokens in context window than DeepSeek-V3. DeepSeek-V3 is $16.63 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3 was introduced as a major architectural advancement, developed with 671B mixture-of-experts parameters and trained on 14.8 trillion tokens. Built to be three times faster than V2 while maintaining open-source availability, it demonstrates competitive performance against frontier closed-source models and represents a significant leap in efficient large-scale model design.
9 months newer

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek
2024-12-25

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 2 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek-V3
DeepSeek