Comprehensive side-by-side LLM comparison
Claude Sonnet 4.5 leads with 18.9% higher average benchmark score. DeepSeek-V3.1 offers 63.7K more tokens in context window than Claude Sonnet 4.5. DeepSeek-V3.1 is $16.73 cheaper per million tokens. Claude Sonnet 4.5 supports multimodal inputs. Overall, Claude Sonnet 4.5 is the stronger choice for coding tasks.
Anthropic
Claude Sonnet 4.5 was developed to bridge human thinking and machine assistance, allowing people to work with language and tools in a more conversational and natural way. Built with a focus on turning ideas into results, it represents an evolution in making AI feel less mechanical while maintaining strong capabilities across reasoning, coding, and collaborative tasks.
DeepSeek
DeepSeek-V3.1 was developed as an incremental advancement over DeepSeek-V3, designed to refine the mixture-of-experts architecture with improved training techniques. Built to enhance quality and efficiency while maintaining the open-source philosophy, it represents continued iteration on DeepSeek's flagship model line.
8 months newer

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek
2025-01-10

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
2025-09-29
Cost per million tokens (USD)

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
Context window and performance specifications
Average performance across 4 common benchmarks

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
Performance comparison across key benchmark categories

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
Claude Sonnet 4.5
2025-01-31
Available providers and their performance metrics

Claude Sonnet 4.5
Anthropic
ZeroEval


Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1

Claude Sonnet 4.5

DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepSeek-V3.1
DeepInfra
Novita